Incredible Human Mind- How do We Learn?
Learning theories can be defined as an organized set of principles explaining
how individuals acquire, retain, and recall knowledge. In order to build a
learning theory; results, means and inputs are the required components. There
are different approaches to learning each representing a variety of
disciplinary perspectives. Behaviorists discuss that learning
is a passive absorption and could be fully understood in terms of
observable events whereas cognivitists believes that learning
is an active assimilation and accommodation of new information to existing
cognitive structures. The third approach, social constructivism, argues
that learning is a social enterprise and dependent on the individuals'
interactions with their culture and society. Despite the differences in
learning theories they all share the idea that learning causes a persisting
change in human performance or performance potential.
The polar opposite of objectivism is
interpretivism and its associated learning theory is constructivism. Interpretists
believe that reality is constructed, multiple and holistic. Interpretists
suggest that source of knowledge is reason and reality is
internal to the organism, the meaning is dependent on individual
understanding. An alternative to both objectivism and interpretivism is
pragmatism. According to the pragmatists reality is interpreted,
negotiated and consensual. In other words pragmatists also suggest that reality
is constructed, however, the meaning derived by individuals is believed
to be negotiated within a social context. Unlike interpretists, the source
of knowledge is not only reason but also it is experience. Art and
philosophy can be regarded as the subjects that interpretivist learning theory
can be strongly associated with. The third learning theory is Pragmatists,
this epistemological tradition indicate that prior knowledge
structures and interactions with the environment and with others are the fundamental aspects in
learning. The pioneer of pragmatism is John Dewey and his
philosophy widely shaped the education system in 20th
century. Dewey viewed knowledge as arising from an active adaptation
of the human organism to its environment and suggested that students’
life experiences should help determine what is taught and learned.
It can be concluded that assumptions about
the nature of knowlegde influence the view of learning and epistomological
beliefs determine the education system of the nation.
Comments
Post a Comment